Keyword Analysis & Research: network rail infrastructure limited v morris

Keyword Analysis


Keyword Research: People who searched network rail infrastructure limited v morris also searched

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the issue in Network Rail Ltd v Morris?

Network Rail Ltd v Morris (2004): private nuisance – the test of sensitivity vs foreseeability. on Network Rail Ltd v Morris (2004): private nuisance – the test of sensitivity vs foreseeability. Areas of applicable law: Tort law – Private nuisance – Foreseeability.

What was the case of Morris v Morris?

on Network Rail Ltd v Morris (2004): private nuisance – the test of sensitivity vs foreseeability. Areas of applicable law: Tort law – Private nuisance – Foreseeability.

Why did the Network Rail Ltd lose business?

The fact of the case: The Network Rail Ltd, the defendant, installed new electronic singling system for its rail network which caused electromagnetic interference with the claimant’s recording studio which was situated about 80 meters away. Due to the interference, the claimant lost business and brought an action for nuisance against the defendant.

Is Network Rail a nuisance?

Held: The court agreed with Network Rail i.e. the interference from the electromagnetics was not foreseeable so there was no nuisance. So, although there was interference, and this interference was by a state of affairs, it wasn’t a nuisance because the effect wasn’t foreseeable


Search Results related to network rail infrastructure limited v morris on Search Engine